AC Milan21-defending against Torino in a series, a match was overshadowed by one by match Controversy involving Mexican striker Santi Gimenez and the American edge Christian Pulisic. Fallout centers on a missed penalty kick during the first half, with reports suggesting a disagreement between the two players about who should have taken the site park.
This incident has led to a wave of discussion among AC Milan supporters, To raise questions about the team’s penal strategy And the relationship between its key players.
Milan, who already beats 1-0 after an early own goal, was assigned a penalty in the 33rd minute. Reports indicate that a disagreement arose between Gimen And Pulisic over who will take the penalty.
Pulisic finally took the penalty but missed, a crucial moment that contributed to the loss. This missed opportunity drove the debate among the fans, of which many felt that GimenezGiven his consistent success from the penalty site at his former club Feyenoord, should have taken the penalty.
Streak ended 😫 Christian Pulisic is denied from the penalty for the first time in his career by Torinos Vanja Milinković-Savić! ❌
Gimenez past experience at Feyenoord
This is not the first time Gimenez has been involved in a penalty. During his time at Feyenoord, he challenged the established penalty, Krekun Kökçü (Team captain), for the spot kick tasks early in their time with the club.
While this resulted in a less internal discussion, it was quickly resolved. This previous experience has added another warehouse to the current situation in AC Milan, which is pursuing further debate on how law should handle criminal liability.
The event involving Gimenez and Pulisic highlights broader issues of criminal liability and the importance of drawing up clear protocols in a team. The lack of a clearly appointed penalty and the subsequent disagreement has aroused concern About potential internal divisions within the Milan squad. This incident can have long -term consequences, which affects both the team’s penalty frequency and its internal law dynamics.
